Author: pavel
Date: 10:45:59 06/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2002 at 12:53:46, Marc van Hal wrote: > >Well you know I am someone who prefers the threuth above nonsens >I rather see a program who can reproduce at least 10 perfect games >Then a 1000-0 score against Fritz . (the name fame and glory can all be false >based on this.) > >Though mostlikely it will win more games if it can play perfect games! >Fritz can come out of openingsbook in a position it doesn't like. >It can be to positinal . >Maybe the Nunn or Knaak openings would be better. > >The games which where shown on chessbits where all openings which where >more prefereable for Rebel then for Fritz >This already doesn't give me a good cleu of the strenght of RebelXP. >Only of the weaknes of Fritz! >So intresting for Frans You only can learn from mistakes and not from your won >games. > >Getting info about the time used for epd diagrams >Doesn't give me a cleu on how strong it is neither. >It doesn't show how the game play is >Which also was proven by the Rebel Century3 contest! > >Regards Marc Define perfect game. And tell me how will you know when it's a perfect game. pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.