Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 06:07:27 06/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2002 at 08:56:04, Adam Oellermann wrote: >On June 25, 2002 at 07:54:35, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>On June 25, 2002 at 05:09:04, Adam Oellermann wrote: >> >>... >>>As I understand it, the Power4 blows the doors off Itanium2 for integer >>>performance. So a dual for approx $20000 and a quad for approx $30000 would >>>represent an *immense* amount of chess for your money. Me, I'd love to see >>>Crafty on one of these guys clean up ICC... Of course, while it's dreamtime, IBM >>>have 32-way boxes with 1.4GHz Power4 CPUs >>> >>>Cheers >>>Adam >> >>Bob, would you compare the speed of such computer and the one who run Cray >>Blitz, please ? > >Surely the differences in the architecture/purpose between a 64-bit SMP Unix box >and a Cray must fill any honest comparison with weasel words. I am sure there >are some things which the Cray would do much faster; some the big IBM boxes >could probably compete. I would ***guess*** that the Cray would run Cray Blitz >faster, but a 32x1.4GHz Power4 would run Crafty faster; Cray Blitz taking >advantage of unusual features of the Cray, with Crafty being more suited for >"general-purpose" computers. > >Disclaimer: I've never even seen a Cray up close, and therefore defer to just >about anyone who might have an opinion on this :) My question was a bit unclear, I just would to know the comparison, in Nodes/secondes between "CrayBlitz on cray" and "Crafty on such machine" :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.