Author: Ron Langeveld
Date: 11:31:08 06/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2002 at 10:53:00, maria clara benedicto wrote: >if winboard engines? best are crafty & yace. Within the group of winboard engines Crafty and Yace are not known for their extensive chessknowledge; I am afraid you pay to much attention to elo ratings here. I have to admit though that chessknowledge should not be the major criteria for engines fit to consult in corr chess. Good corr players are supposed to have that knowledge themselves, and maybe use a tactical "beast" to double check for blunders. > >regards > >maria > >On June 25, 2002 at 00:53:55, Aloisio Ponti Lopes wrote: > >>A friend of mine that is a "chess-postalist" (he is playing more than 90 chess >>games by e-mail!) asked me which engine was the best to help him analyse the >>games. >> >>I couldn't answer... I really like Hiarcs while analysing a game; I think Fritz >>is much of the time too optmistic about some positions I don't like, and Chess >>Tiger seems to be hunting for the king all the time... >> >>Is this really a very difficult choice ? What do you folks think about it? Which >>one is the best? >> >>A. ponti
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.