Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 13:27:38 06/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2002 at 15:08:08, Ron Langeveld wrote:
>On June 25, 2002 at 03:29:24, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On June 25, 2002 at 01:21:58, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>On June 24, 2002 at 12:28:37, Roy Eassa wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>That's Junior running on a 450 MHz K6 defeating Hiarcs 8 running on a 1200 MHz
>>>>Athlon, in a 40-game match?
>>>>
>>>>IMO, astounding!
>>>
>>>Yes if this is true, Hiarcs's rating will be quite low!
>>>
>>>Jouni
>>
>>And Hiarcs deserves this low rating. There is definitely something wrong with
>>it, and I guess it is the (creation of the?) tournament book.
>>Hiarcs 7.32 new book was created by general.ctg (from Fritz 5/5.32 IIRC) PLUS
>>converted h7.bok or so. This timeit is ONLY converted h8.bok. This may leave
>>Hiarcs out of book where general.ctg might be helpful to play some more good
>>moves.
>>My Hiarcs 8 results with CD book are better than with tournament book...
>>And SSDF tests Hiarcs 8 with tournament book...
>
>I agree. The available tournament book is a major embarrassment, as I have
>stated before on this podium. I have generated my own book for Hiarcs 8 with
>2400+ games and imported a selection of recent 2550+ games to establish the
>tournament moves. This book is still being tested, but after more than 2000
>games Hiarcs is allmost on par with Fritz 7 and Frit7.ctg (trailing less than 30
>elo points).
-----------------
If you used the "Lunsen Book" for Hiarcs 8, it would be very interesting to see
how much better the results might be, but maybe it wouldn't make much of a
difference in computer vrs. computer matches!
Regards,
Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.