Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 14:33:07 06/25/02

Go up one level in this thread

On June 25, 2002 at 17:28:10, Russell Reagan wrote:

>And as for the original testing if there is a pawn on E6, don't you keep a
>64-square array anyway along with your bitboards?

IMHO That's not really bitboards any more.

>If so, is there anything that
>a classical approach can do more efficiently than a bitboard approach? Edge
>detection and attack detection seem to be two of 0x88's typical strong points,
>but I don't see how they would be faster than bitboards. Or is this a matter of
>the hardware you use? Ex. 32-bit hardware, it might be close...64-bit hardware,
>bitboards faster for everything...?

Generating non-capturing moves.

--
GCP

• Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Daniel Clausen 01:45:55 06/26/02
  • Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Gian-Carlo Pascutto 02:09:12 06/26/02
    • Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Daniel Clausen 02:12:20 06/26/02
• Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Robert Hyatt 16:56:26 06/25/02
  • Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Daniel Clausen 01:50:00 06/26/02
    • Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Robert Hyatt 21:07:56 06/26/02
    • Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Tim Foden 07:21:40 06/26/02
      • That must be it, thanks! [n/t] Daniel Clausen 12:35:57 06/26/02
    • Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Russell Reagan 06:14:19 06/26/02
      • Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Daniel Clausen 06:20:03 06/26/02
        • Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Robert Hyatt 14:24:00 06/27/02
          • Re: Mixing 0x88 and bitboards Robert Hyatt 14:25:04 06/27/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.