Author: Harald Faber
Date: 02:10:15 06/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2002 at 01:48:12, Kevin Strickland wrote: >On June 26, 2002 at 01:16:01, Harald Faber wrote: > >>Although the file sizes and in fact also the contents of the .ctb and .cto are >>identical, the comparison of the huge 553.553.920 byte Lunsen.ctg and >>Powerbook2000.ctg indeed shows several differences between Lunsen and Powerbook >>2000. Compared with WindowsCommander 5.0, File->compare by contents, binary. I >>have no idea how WC5 compares, but I assume that this result is correct. >>Although I also do not know the structure of the trees and how 2 of 3 files can >>have the same contents but the third does not, I feel the due to apologize here >>in public for calling the Lunsen book illegal, stolen powerbook 2000 from >>ChessBase. > >Possibly you should have investigated a tad more before shooting your damn mouth >off and possibly ruining someone's reputation. Possibly you should contribute more than just pointing the finger on me. Or does it make you feel tough and brave? >How would you like it if someone publically attacked you before finding out all >possibilities? Wouldn't feel very good would it? There have been enough reasonable and serious hints for an assumption to being illegal. >I supposed next time you'll think before you shoot your f**king mouth off. As I can see by your words that you are a real friend of mine. Is that all you can do, complaining, shouting, using vulgarity? Seems so, although I didn't check the binary contents. :-) >Probably not though.. > >Sad isn't it? Sad is only your posting here. Gladly your inaccurate reaction is the only one of that kind. Remember that *I apologize*, here in public. I could also have been quiet and say nothing.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.