Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Human Super-GM Equivalents To Chess Programs...

Author: Martin Müller

Date: 03:31:23 08/04/98

Go up one level in this thread


On August 03, 1998 at 20:28:44, fca wrote:

>Can we Kompile a list of (stereotypical maybe) human equivalents to the top
>programs?  Yes, there is no suggestion that the programs play anywhere *as well*
>as the super-GMs named.... only a style-parallel is called for.
>
>Like, say, Chess Genius == Capablanca (reasons: simplistic style, careful play,
>accumulation of small advantages, quite happy to win in the endgame - avoids
>violent pyrotechnics in favour of technical victory) or Karpov, even.
>
>Or Chess System Tal == Lasker (poisoned water; maybe makes deliberately
>provocative moves; anti-establishment/Tarrasch) - maybe there is a case for Tal
>too.
>
>Fritz = Alekhine?
>
>And what about Nimzo?  :-)
>
>And Deeper Blue?
>
>Additions?  Suggestions?  Comments?  Criticism?  Refutation?
>
>Kind regards
>
>fca
>
>PS: Do not forget Voice Sensory Chess Challenger.

I think MChess Pro 6 would be Korchnoi
for playing extremely active

Fritz 5 is Kasparov for his success and riskful playing

Hiarcs 6 could be Ivantchuk for deep ideas

Crafty reminds me of Short, very good but not unbeatable...


kind regards,
Maritn



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.