Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:31:47 06/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2002 at 18:55:31, Peter Berger wrote:
>On June 27, 2002 at 14:06:54, Roy Eassa wrote:
>
>>I spent an hour+ with Fritz 7 exploring variations and came to the conclusion
>>that 1.c4 is pretty good and with best play gives White an advantage (and a win
>>if Black does not play perfectly), but 1.Ba5 *followed by* 2.c4 is a big win for
>>White.
>
>Hi Roy,
>
>I checked your analysis and I think you are completely right with your
>conclusions.
>
>But I also think this means that this testposition isn't really good at all as
>it is too easy to get the "right" move for the wrong reasons here.
>
>Some Yace analysis :
>
>1054856912 30:59.4 0.19 14. 1.c4 Nxb4 2.Qxb4 Nf6 3.Re7 Qc6 4.Rxf7 {HT}
> {-180}
>1304583669 38:29.9 0.24 15t 1.c4 Nxb4 2.Qxb4 Nf6 3.Re7 Qc6 4.Rxf7 Kb8
> 5.Rxg7 Ka7 6.Bf1 Ne4 7.Bg2 Rab8 8.Re7 {HT}
> {-100}
>1584066537 47:00.4 0.25 15t+ 1.Ba5 Kb8 2.c4 Ne7 3.Qc3 Nc6 4.Be4 Qc8 5.Bxc6
> Qxc6 6.Qxg7 Qf6 7.Qxf6 Rh7 8.Re7 Nxf6 {HT}
> {-180}
>1968519738 58:50.3 0.59 15++ 1.Ba5 Kb8 2.c4 Ne7 3.f5 Nc6 4.Qf4+ Ka7 5.Be4
> Qe7 6.Bxc6 Qa3+ 7.Kb1 Nf2 8.Rd7 Rhe8 {90}
>2062791374 1:01:33 0.59 15t 1.Ba5 Kb8 2.c4 Nge3H 3.Rxe3H Nxe3H 4.Qxe3H Re8H
> 5.Be4H Qe7H 6.Qb6H {HT}
>2766445199 1:20:56 0.59 15. 1.Ba5 Kb8 2.c4 Nge3 3.Rxe3 Nxe3 4.Qxe3 Re8
> 5.Be4 Qe7 6.Qb6
>4213758463 2:03:54 0.71 16t 1.Ba5 Kb8 2.c4 Rc8 3.Bc2 Qd6 4.Kb2 Qf6+ 5.Kb1
> Nge3 6.Rxe3 Nxe3 7.Qxe3 Qh4 8.Qe5+ Ka7 9.Qd4+
> {HT} {-70}
>2373675280 3:12:23 0.71 16. 1.Ba5 Kb8 2.c4 Rc8 3.Bc2 Qd6 4.Kb2 Qf6+ 5.Kb1
> Nge3 6.Rxe3 Nxe3 7.Qxe3 Qh4 8.Qe5+ Ka7 9.Qd4+
> {HT} {-70}
>
>A buffer overflow in the node count ;-) ?
I get +2.0 for c4, Ba5 is also pretty positive but not so much as c4.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.