Author: Robert Henry Durrett
Date: 16:53:39 06/28/02
Which would give you "more chess"? Same money either way. If the $30000. computer allowed you to load the entire chess engine [or most of it] into a cache, then maybe this would be the winner? If the ten PCs, with top chess engines, were used would this give "more chess"? [May need to consider the need for a window air conditioner and a good set of earplugs.] How the ten PCs were utilized might be the main consideration. Do they work independently? If not, then what? Incidentally, if all ten PCs were rack mounted into a single standard 19" rack, someone might claim the loaded rack was a single chess computer. This might cause a little bit of confusion. Hence, it may be necessary to define what is meant by a "single $30000 chess computer." Any thoughts on this? Which is best? What would YOU prefer? Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.