Author: Robert Henry Durrett
Date: 17:11:12 06/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2002 at 20:08:50, Mike Byrne wrote: >On June 28, 2002 at 19:53:39, Robert Henry Durrett wrote: > >> >>Which would give you "more chess"? Same money either way. >> >>If the $30000. computer allowed you to load the entire chess engine [or most of >>it] into a cache, then maybe this would be the winner? >> >>If the ten PCs, with top chess engines, were used would this give "more chess"? >> >>[May need to consider the need for a window air conditioner and a good set of >>earplugs.] >> >>How the ten PCs were utilized might be the main consideration. Do they work >>independently? If not, then what? >> >>Incidentally, if all ten PCs were rack mounted into a single standard 19" rack, >>someone might claim the loaded rack was a single chess computer. This might >>cause a little bit of confusion. Hence, it may be necessary to define what is >>meant by a "single $30000 chess computer." >> >>Any thoughts on this? Which is best? What would YOU prefer? >> >>Bob D. > >$30,000 > >;>) May I take this to mean ONE computer? If so, the "$30000 question" is: "Which one?" Bob D. Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.