Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Ambiguous moves in algebraic notation

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 06:26:08 06/29/02

Go up one level in this thread

On June 29, 2002 at 05:32:08, Daniel Clausen wrote:

>Bad dependencies will hurt, sooner or later.

So if I use the move->toString(ALGEBRAIC, &position); approach, is that being
dependant? Also, what do you mean that it will hurt sooner or later? How will it
cause problems? If I later decide to change how move or position is implemented,
then I will have to change the other accordingly. Is that what you mean?

Russell

• Re: Ambiguous moves in algebraic notation Daniel Clausen 05:45:51 06/30/02
  • Re: Ambiguous moves in algebraic notation Russell Reagan 11:15:30 06/30/02
  • Re: Ambiguous moves in algebraic notation Sven Reichard 09:02:36 06/30/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.