Author: Robert Henry Durrett
Date: 07:34:34 06/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2002 at 19:53:39, Robert Henry Durrett wrote: > >Which would give you "more chess"? Same money either way. > >If the $30000. computer allowed you to load the entire chess engine [or most of >it] into a cache, then maybe this would be the winner? > >If the ten PCs, with top chess engines, were used would this give "more chess"? > >[May need to consider the need for a window air conditioner and a good set of >earplugs.] > >How the ten PCs were utilized might be the main consideration. Do they work >independently? If not, then what? > >Incidentally, if all ten PCs were rack mounted into a single standard 19" rack, >someone might claim the loaded rack was a single chess computer. This might >cause a little bit of confusion. Hence, it may be necessary to define what is >meant by a "single $30000 chess computer." > >Any thoughts on this? Which is best? What would YOU prefer? > >Bob D. At rgcc, Hyatt says $70000 to $80000 is required. Maybe need to compare One $80000 Chess Computer versus Fourty $2000 PCs Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.