Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:30:07 06/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2002 at 19:37:21, James T. Walker wrote: >On June 29, 2002 at 15:57:29, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On June 29, 2002 at 13:53:44, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On June 29, 2002 at 13:25:15, ERIQ wrote: >>> >>> >>>Based on my own tests on a Prism overclocked to 54 Mhz, testing it against >>>several Low expert winboard programs with an Intel celeron 433 Mhz 128 MB Ram, >>>and Novag Turquoise so far about 2135, and on the current result of the SSDF, >>>here is the score against Mephisto RISC 1 MB rated 2103. >>> >>>PS: But on a low Palm 16 Mhz overclocked to 29 Mhz like Peter, it is probably >>>rated 2090. >>> >> >>I don't disagree with your number at all, Jorge :-). >> >>When it is about the hardware difference it probably doesn't matter as all >>overclocked Palms are of similar speed. >> >>ERIQ's question had a smiley , my answer had one, too - 2087 is simply the first >>number that came to my mind , it might as well have been 2117 as a matter of >>fact. >> >>Based on published results I'd bet on 2050<Tiger rating <2150 SSDF , but not a >>huge sum of money :-) >> >>Peter > >I'd bet that the Mephisto Risc 1M is stronger than 2103 ! I believe the SSDF >list deflates the lower ratings and inflates the higher ratings. >Jim I think that you should not compare ssdf rating with human rating. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.