Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 10:10:24 06/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2002 at 12:21:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >It won't be amusing, because all those pigs flying overhead are going to make >a horrible mess on our cars. Porting from windows to unix is very non- >trivial. xwindows has nothing in common with microsoft windows, except that >they might "look" the same to an end-user. It would mean a total-rewrite of >the GUI, which would be expensive and time-consuming. For a tournament, a text GUI would be doable. >For no practical return on the investment. And with fritz being in asm, >converting that to a unix assembler would be _another_ bit of fun. It's not the unix (actually AT&T) syntax that's the problem - the problem is that it's not an Intel x86 machine. The assembly syntax conversion itself can be mostly automated. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.