Author: Martin Müller
Date: 09:52:01 08/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 1998 at 06:56:42, fca wrote: >On August 04, 1998 at 06:31:23, Martin Müller wrote: > >>On August 03, 1998 at 20:28:44, fca wrote: >> >>>Can we Kompile a list of (stereotypical maybe) human equivalents to the top >>>programs? Yes, there is no suggestion that the programs play anywhere *as well* >>>as the super-GMs named.... only a style-parallel is called for. >>> >>>Like, say, Chess Genius == Capablanca (reasons: simplistic style, careful play, >>>accumulation of small advantages, quite happy to win in the endgame - avoids >>>violent pyrotechnics in favour of technical victory) or Karpov, even. >>> >>>Or Chess System Tal == Lasker (poisoned water; maybe makes deliberately >>>provocative moves; anti-establishment/Tarrasch) - maybe there is a case for Tal >>>too. >>> >>>Fritz = Alekhine? >>> > >>I think MChess Pro 6 would be Korchnoi >>for playing extremely active >> >>Fritz 5 is Kasparov for his success and riskful playing >> >>Hiarcs 6 could be Ivantchuk for deep ideas >> >>Crafty reminds me of Short, very good but not unbeatable... > >And Short too is a tactician primarily - agreed? Yes, I do agree. It is excellent at tactics. A program created by Bob Hyatt cannot tase like soup without salt! >> >> >>kind regards, >>Maritn > >Rebel IMO is the best all-rounder - Fischer? > >Ferret? There is something very irritating to me about Ferret's style as an >opponent: it is well-named IMO (I mean this in the most complimentary sense). >Who fits? > >Kittinger's programs? I would say Tal maybe - attack/sacrifice, sometimes >unsound > >Nimzo? (I do not have it) Nimzo could by Anand. Also very tactic but with it's very own character. I really do not know how to describe it. It is not compromising. Something like the original King with a good positional understanding. > >DB II? (I do not have it yet) > >VCC? :-) > >Kittinger's programs? > > >And... available super-GMs include: > >Philidor >Morphy >Anderssen >Steinitz >Nimzovich >Rubinstein >Keres >Botvinnik >Smyslov >Petrosyan >Spassky >Anand >Kramnik This would be definitely Rebel 9 or 10. Very strong and not accepting certain systems/rulers > >Maybe retro-fit? > >Kind regards > >fca Kind regards Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.