Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer chess schools of thought

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 03:50:51 07/01/02

Go up one level in this thread

On July 01, 2002 at 06:34:31, Richard Pijl wrote:

>>I presume the reason for this is the slow InCheck implementation, so the idea is
>>to call the heavy functions as little as possible.
>
>And search less nodes as you do not have to search the check evasions. I think
>that is the real winner.

Oh well I don't do that in qsearch. It just means that I might evaluate a
position where the king is in check, but that's still better than to evaluate a
position where the king has been captured, IMHO. :)

-S.

• Re: Computer chess schools of thought Robert Hyatt 06:55:19 07/02/02
  • Re: Computer chess schools of thought Sune Fischer 09:31:15 07/02/02
    • Re: Computer chess schools of thought Robert Hyatt 11:47:51 07/02/02
• Re: Computer chess schools of thought Richard Pijl 04:07:10 07/01/02
  • Re: Computer chess schools of thought Sune Fischer 04:18:45 07/01/02
    • Re: Computer chess schools of thought Russell Reagan 10:04:26 07/01/02
      • Re: Computer chess schools of thought Robert Hyatt 06:58:37 07/02/02
    • Re: Computer chess schools of thought Richard Pijl 04:50:12 07/01/02
      • Re: Computer chess schools of thought Sune Fischer 05:57:20 07/01/02
        • Re: Computer chess schools of thought Richard Pijl 06:28:49 07/01/02
          • Re: Computer chess schools of thought Richard Pijl 14:43:44 07/01/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.