Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 08:03:02 07/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2002 at 10:11:35, Sven Reichard wrote: >On June 30, 2002 at 23:09:32, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On June 30, 2002 at 13:10:24, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On June 30, 2002 at 12:21:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>><snip> >>I was thinking only about a conversion to X86 unix, as in linux. The >>"syntax" is reversed between microsoft and GAS, which means _every_ line >>of assembly gets modified. >> >>A _big_ undertaking. Even without the problem of different architectures. >><snip> > >FWIW, there are assemblers for GNU-Linux on x86 that use Intel-style syntax, >e.g., nasm. >Sven. How about for supercomputer chips, which is where we talk about. we talk about highly optimized x86 assembly , optimized over the years, which has to run on a super
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.