Author: Sven Reichard
Date: 08:25:48 07/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2002 at 11:03:02, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On July 01, 2002 at 10:11:35, Sven Reichard wrote: > >>On June 30, 2002 at 23:09:32, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On June 30, 2002 at 13:10:24, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>> >>>><snip> >>>I was thinking only about a conversion to X86 unix, as in linux. The >>>"syntax" is reversed between microsoft and GAS, which means _every_ line >>>of assembly gets modified. >>> >>>A _big_ undertaking. Even without the problem of different architectures. >>><snip> >> >>FWIW, there are assemblers for GNU-Linux on x86 that use Intel-style syntax, >>e.g., nasm. >>Sven. > >How about for supercomputer chips, which is where we talk about. >we talk about highly optimized x86 assembly , optimized over the years, >which has to run on a super This is an impossible task. I was referring just to the lines above.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.