Author: Albert Silver
Date: 15:37:27 07/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2002 at 15:21:09, Dann Corbit wrote:
>On July 01, 2002 at 14:55:41, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On July 01, 2002 at 14:49:47, pavel wrote:
>>
>>>On July 01, 2002 at 14:47:40, ERIQ wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm not sure about you guys but I'm in shock !!
>>>
>>>Because how the PGN output looks?
>>>
>>>;)
>>>cheers,
>>>pavs
>>
>>Either that or because Hiarcs 8 on an Athlon 1200 lost to Junior 7 on a K6/450
>>in a previous SSDF match.
>
>In a span of 4 games, we can expect anything to happen. In the Ridderkerk
>tournament, Quark 1.76 blasted Crafty 18.15 4-0. I ran the same programs over
>the weekend at G/90 and got:
>
> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
>1 Crafty-18.15 : 2522 143 105 24 56.2 % 2478 37.5 %
>2 Quark v1.76beta : 2478 105 143 24 43.8 % 2522 37.5 %
>
>I don't know why anyone would be in shock about any 4-0 result unless there were
>at least a 500 ELO difference.
I'm aware of this, however it IS interesting that H8 lost to J7 in a 40-game
match whilst the last ran on significantly inferior hardware whereas here it is
leading the same program on better hardware after 12 games. Maybe the next 28
games will send this temporary result down the drain, and then again maybe not.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.