Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:01:11 07/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2002 at 02:32:48, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On June 30, 2002 at 23:09:32, Robert Hyatt wrote: > > >>>For a tournament, a text GUI would be doable. >> >>Looks _very_ hard. All the book access code is in the GUI. The learning >>is in the GUI. All the option setting is in the GUI. > >Come on, he's a professional. This would be trivial to deal >with. Trivial to write a complete opening book facility with book learning? Trivial to write code to adjust the internal parameters, adjust the clock check for input, etc? I don't think so. Not impossible. But definitely non-trivial. Pro or not. > >>I was thinking only about a conversion to X86 unix, as in linux. The >>"syntax" is reversed between microsoft and GAS, which means _every_ line >>of assembly gets modified. >> >>A _big_ undertaking. Even without the problem of different architectures. > >intel2gas, gas2intel > They haven't worked flawlessly for me... And it doesn't address the MIPS instruction set that Vincent will be running under... >-- >GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.