Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 17:03:51 08/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
Hi KK: I have posted about this very same issue some time, but now I wonder if inside this approach maybe there is a kind of hideous infinite progression. When the moment to decide which of the available evals must be used, tacitly we are thinking in a third engine or device to choose, to decide, but then which will be the eval of this third device to choose? ¿Positional, tactical, what? Then maybe we'll need a fourth device to give an alternative way to decide about the first lines of elvals and, and and. To avoid that circularity or progression the third device should be so crude than, then, all the idea lose ground. fernando
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.