Author: blass uri
Date: 17:25:43 08/04/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 1998 at 20:03:51, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Hi KK: >I have posted about this very same issue some time, but now I wonder if inside >this approach maybe there is a kind of hideous infinite progression. When the >moment to decide which of the available evals must be used, tacitly we are >thinking in a third engine or device to choose, to decide, but then which will >be the eval of this third device to choose? ¿Positional, tactical, what? Then >maybe we'll need a fourth device to give an alternative way to decide about the >first lines of elvals and, and and. To avoid that circularity or progression the >third device should be so crude than, then, all the idea lose ground. >fernando There is a simple idea to decide. start to use fritz5. If you see fritz5 does not reach a big depth in a short time than stop using fritz and use another program. I think this idea will give a program that is better than fritz Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.