Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 01:06:26 07/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2002 at 21:39:39, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On July 03, 2002 at 17:57:37, Sune Fischer wrote: > > >>Then it has to be because of the leading zeros, because usually it _is_ a 64 bit >>number. The same trick on the file worked great, but that number is >>0x0101010101010101, which is then correctly read as a 64 bit type. > >Of course, it is because of the leading zeros. Anyway, to have an unsigned long >long constant, use 0xffULL in Standard ISO C-99. Unfortunately, this is not yet >supported by all major compilers. Also, the other Standard C way - (unsigned >long long)0xff is not supported by all compilers. However this later method may >be easier to support practicably portbable by some typedef. Yes, it also "looks" better, but its not supported by msvc++ 6 :( >Regards, >Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.