Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 02:00:00 07/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2002 at 04:39:06, Sune Fischer wrote: >I like the idea even less, actually. Because where do you go from opening to >middelgame? If your book is large enough you hardly need much 'opening' code, >and in any case I think of it more as a smooth transition, and I believe the >code should reflect that rather than be boxed into phases. I completely agree. I only used these to illustrate that maybe you want to have different evaluation methods. The simple dividing into seperate game phases was the first that popped into my mind. Sheesh, I'd be a bad teacher.. always choosing a bad example. :) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.