Author: stuart taylor
Date: 07:20:34 07/04/02
I'm not repeating questions with this. I'm continuing the sequence and building further on previous discussions and conclusions. My question is, what do computer programs still lack which the top humans do not (lack)? Can we yet say that computers can come up with true masterpieces which are indeed worthy of deep study and of being displayed for the next 100 years as works of art? Or is there something lacking which makes it fall short of such a standard or worthiness? S.Taylor
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.