Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: So what exactly is still missing from computer chess?

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 09:08:37 07/04/02

Go up one level in this thread

On July 04, 2002 at 11:34:13, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On July 04, 2002 at 10:40:31, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>they lack creating a plan. and choosing the right opening for the right
>>opponent.
>
>One could also say that they investigate all possible plans.
>
>Some of the great moves in history, eg. where Fischer seemingly sacrifices a
>rook for no reason at all in an "equal position", doesn't take computers more
>than a few seconds to find.

I don't think they'ii easily find that rook (exchange) sacrifice Petrosian made
against (i think) Reshevsky.

Thosrten Czub, what exact strength are computers lacking in that which they
don't look at many plans?
S.Taylor

• Re: So what exactly is still missing from computer chess? Sune Fischer 09:35:49 07/04/02
  • Re: So what exactly is still missing from computer chess? Marc van Hal 05:06:17 07/05/02
    • Re: So what exactly is still missing from computer chess? Robert Henry Durrett 07:28:10 07/05/02
      • Re: So what exactly is still missing from computer chess? Uri Blass 08:03:15 07/05/02
    • Re: So what exactly is still missing from computer chess? Sune Fischer 07:20:26 07/05/02
    • Re: So what exactly is still missing etc. Now my big question! stuart taylor 06:06:57 07/05/02
      • Re: So what exactly is still missing etc. Now my big question! Marc van Hal 17:48:52 07/05/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.