Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: So what exactly is still missing from computer chess?

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 09:35:49 07/04/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 04, 2002 at 12:08:37, stuart taylor wrote:

>On July 04, 2002 at 11:34:13, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>On July 04, 2002 at 10:40:31, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>
>>>they lack creating a plan. and choosing the right opening for the right
>>>opponent.
>>
>>One could also say that they investigate all possible plans.
>>
>>Some of the great moves in history, eg. where Fischer seemingly sacrifices a
>>rook for no reason at all in an "equal position", doesn't take computers more
>>than a few seconds to find.
>
>I don't think they'ii easily find that rook (exchange) sacrifice Petrosian made
>against (i think) Reshevsky.

I'm not saying they can find all great moves ever played, only that they have
less of a problem with the unintuitive moves. Many of those exclamation mark
moves made by grandmasters are simply piece of cake for the progs.

-S.



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.