Author: Jonathan Lee
Date: 17:54:53 07/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2002 at 10:20:34, stuart taylor wrote:
>I'm not repeating questions with this. I'm continuing the sequence and building
>further on previous discussions and conclusions.
> My question is, what do computer programs still lack which the top humans do
>not (lack)?
> Can we yet say that computers can come up with true masterpieces which are
>indeed worthy of deep study and of being displayed for the next 100 years as
>works of art?
> Or is there something lacking which makes it fall short of such a standard or
>worthiness?
> S.Taylor
The question is how to get the computer nodes smaller in very complex
positions (such as a closed middlegame with a GM having a queen) at 20 or more
plies.
My pattern recognition can be found at the CCC search archives.
Maybe a 100 GHZ will equal (many draws) the top 100 in the world in closed
games in game in 60 minutes.
The last 35 years in computer chess (1967 - 2002) has been monumental
change; I don't know what the remainder of the 21st century will be.
Jonathan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.