Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 07:33:09 07/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2002 at 10:15:51, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: No Thomas, you are the one who is wrong. Adams himself has explained that 21 ... d5? is a mistake. Here I quote Adams' view on this move in NIC magazine 2002, no. 3: 21 ... d5?! 'This move shows a lack of experience with this variation. In these lines d5 is often a dangerous move to play, as white's pieces become very active. Better was either 21 ... a5 or 21 ... Rc8 22 Bb3 Bd7 23 Qf3 Be6 shoring up the sensitive a2-g8 diagonal, as in Topalov-Ivanchuk, Monaco 2001 blind'. To your move 23 ... Qd7 Adams states: '24 Qh5 is similar to the game'. He says that 23 ... Qd6 was worth considering. So it is not Alex trying to impress people, but he just does know Adams' analysis. Like I do :-) Jeroen >I think Alexander Kure is wrong.Ponarmarjov would for shure play 23...Qd7 with a >equal position.For example 24.Qg6 Bd5 25.Qd3 Bc6 = > >It lools like Alexander likes to impress people. >
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.