Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:37:00 07/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2002 at 09:57:27, Alastair Scott wrote: >On July 07, 2002 at 06:26:27, Uri Blass wrote: > >>This sacrifice can be found for positional reasons and not for tactical reasons >>but most programs do not have high positional scores so they cannot find it for >>positional reasons. > >In that case, ChessGenius 1.5 for Palm (a much more 'positional' program than >even Tiger on its mildest settings) not finding it after 15 minutes is >surprising; it oscillates between Ne7+, Ne3 and Qc5 ... I guess that the positional socres of palm tiger are higher than the positional scores of Genius1.5 for the palm. In other words Genius1.5 is more materialistic. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.