Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 11:13:50 07/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2002 at 13:41:43, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On July 07, 2002 at 10:33:09, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>On July 07, 2002 at 10:15:51, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >> >>No Thomas, you are the one who is wrong. Adams himself has >>explained that 21 ... d5? is a mistake. Here I quote Adams' >>view on this move in NIC magazine 2002, no. 3: >> >>21 ... d5?! >> >>'This move shows a lack of experience with this variation. >>In these lines d5 is often a dangerous move to play, as >>white's pieces become very active. Better was either 21 ... a5 >>or 21 ... Rc8 22 Bb3 Bd7 23 Qf3 Be6 shoring up the sensitive >>a2-g8 diagonal, as in Topalov-Ivanchuk, Monaco 2001 blind'. >> >>To your move 23 ... Qd7 Adams states: '24 Qh5 is similar to the >>game'. He says that 23 ... Qd6 was worth considering. >> >>So it is not Alex trying to impress people, but he just does >>know Adams' analysis. Like I do :-) >> >>Jeroen > >Hi Jeroen, > >maye tricky Micky would analyse his position ones again if he have to > >play it against shredder? > >After the above mainvariation it looks like a draw: White has a small advantage in that line. As he had in the game. The problem is, the advantage is large enough to win. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.