Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: WCCC 2002: Round 2 - BRUTUS vs. SJENG (my analysis)

Author: Jeroen Noomen

Date: 11:29:52 07/07/02

Go up one level in this thread

On July 07, 2002 at 13:41:43, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:

This is by no means forced. And the explanation of Adams
is very clear: d5? is dubious as it opens up the position
for the white bishop.

Besides, it is much better to look at the position and use
human chess knowledge instead of giving a mere computer line
including evaluation :-) Furthermore, in this position I put
much more trust in the super GM evaluation then in the
computer one.

Jeroen


>After the above mainvariation it looks like a draw:
>
> 18 140:55  +0.77 24.Dh5 Dc7 25.Tad1 Tad8 26.Txd8 Txd8 27.Dxe5 Dxe5 28.Txe5 g6
> 29.Te2 h5 30.a3 Lg7 31.c4 Td3 32.cxb5
>
>Things are in chess often not so clear.
>
>Greetings
>Thomas

• Re: WCCC 2002: Round 2 - BRUTUS vs. SJENG (my analysis) Marc van Hal 12:36:27 07/07/02
• Re: WCCC 2002: Round 2 - BRUTUS vs. SJENG (my analysis) Thomas Lagershausen 11:45:35 07/07/02
  • Re: WCCC 2002: Round 2 - BRUTUS vs. SJENG (my analysis) martin fierz 16:05:33 07/07/02
    • Re: WCCC 2002: Round 2 - BRUTUS vs. SJENG (my analysis) Uri Blass 16:31:31 07/07/02
      • Re: WCCC 2002: Round 2 - BRUTUS vs. SJENG (my analysis) Daniel Clausen 08:54:09 07/08/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.