Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 11:45:35 07/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2002 at 14:29:52, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >On July 07, 2002 at 13:41:43, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >This is by no means forced. And the explanation of Adams >is very clear: d5? is dubious as it opens up the position >for the white bishop. This evaluation is to general.Chess is a little bit complicater. You have to give variations to convince a good player. > >Besides, it is much better to look at the position and use >human chess knowledge instead of giving a mere computer line >including evaluation :-) Furthermore, in this position I put >much more trust in the super GM evaluation then in the >computer one. Chess is not a question of trust.It is a question of exact analysing. Next time please more content. Thomas > >Jeroen > > >>After the above mainvariation it looks like a draw: >> >> 18 140:55 +0.77 24.Dh5 Dc7 25.Tad1 Tad8 26.Txd8 Txd8 27.Dxe5 Dxe5 28.Txe5 g6 >> 29.Te2 h5 30.a3 Lg7 31.c4 Td3 32.cxb5 >> >>Things are in chess often not so clear. >> >>Greetings >>Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.