Author: martin fierz
Date: 16:05:33 07/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2002 at 14:45:35, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On July 07, 2002 at 14:29:52, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>On July 07, 2002 at 13:41:43, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >> >>This is by no means forced. And the explanation of Adams >>is very clear: d5? is dubious as it opens up the position >>for the white bishop. > >This evaluation is to general.Chess is a little bit complicater. >You have to give variations to convince a good player. > >> >>Besides, it is much better to look at the position and use >>human chess knowledge instead of giving a mere computer line >>including evaluation :-) Furthermore, in this position I put >>much more trust in the super GM evaluation then in the >>computer one. > >Chess is not a question of trust.It is a question of exact analysing. >Next time please more content. what's wrong with a simple and clear explanation why ...d5 is a mistake? just because it's simple doesnt mean it's wrong. and yes, when building opening books, chess IS a matter of trust. and like jeroen, i would definitely trust a 2700+ player much rather than a guy who runs shredder for a few minutes... aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.