Author: Komputer Korner
Date: 05:57:47 08/05/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 1998 at 12:52:01, Robert Pawlak wrote: >On August 04, 1998 at 09:15:30, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Hi Ed: >>Knowing that some people is asking you to shoot on your feet, then I dare to ask >>something for Rebel 11 around 2 years in advance. Besides, after seeing the post > >Actually, now is probably not a bad time to discuss this. > >>written by the presumed mummy of Sean Evans, everything is possible. >>Well, the core of my wish list is not strength but coach functions. I am already >>beaten 95% of the times by rebel 9 and the rest of Top programs and looking at >>an old poll, it seems I am not the only one here. So, strength is not anymore >>the issue. > >I agree with this. > >>I don’t say you should weaken your engine or not to devote some time >>to improvement, OK, but I would like to see a greater effort in the coach >>functions in order, some day, to improve that 95% loses to, let us say, only >>90%. >>What I want, specifically? >>a) a coach function like that of Fritz, BUT not delivered in the setting of a >>weakened level. Coach should be present in any level, at will. >>b) after the end of the game, if on, the coach should appear and show which >>moves were the cause of defeat, explain why and show which were the good moves, >>step by step >>c) after that, the coach should push the student to examine a lot of exercises >>similar to the position pattern where the mistake was committed. Of course this >>assumes Rebel 11 has a huge database with a thoroughly detailed number of key >>positions >>d) rebel 11 should keep in store the mistakes committed and the results of >>exercises so if in another game if a similar positions arises, the coach should >>warn that the player must be careful as much in a similar position he ruined a >>game, remember your exercisses, etc. >>In other words, Ed, I see a coach function operating together with normal game, >>not as something different. Besides, it is more rewarding and motivating to do >>some study of positions when you still are in the mood of playing chess. There >>are very good programs for learning chess, but they are somewhat boring and ask >>from the student an special moment to go through. That is somewhat demanding for >>an old fart like me, above 40 years old and in fact in the verge of 50. >>Give it a thought. Learning functions are the future. I don’t see other reason >>to purchase now a new program. Sure many guys feel like me. >>Regards >>fernando > >How about a feature that also gives you an indication of plans for the pawn >structure and opening that you have played? > >At the risk of being slightly off-topic, I feel that Rebel also needs to support >variations in the game score. That feature alone has kept me from purchasing >it... > >Bob P The biggest drawback of Rebel for a tournament player is that using it as an opening book editor is a pain because you can't edit the book at the same time as having on screen thinking of the position by Rebel. M-Chess Pro and Tascbase also have this problem. -- Komputer Korner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.