Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 14:21:11 07/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 2002 at 16:56:25, Roger D Davis wrote: >On July 08, 2002 at 15:21:03, John Merlino wrote: > >>The MAIN reason why we've never implemented Auto232 is because it is always way >>down the list of features that we would like to implement in each version, and >>it never "makes the cut". It is something that we would like to do if we had >>unlimited time, but since that never is the case, it never gets done. >> >>And the main reason that it is always down our list of to-do items is that it >>offers very little for our typical user. >> >>jm > >"...it offers very little for our typical user." > >In my opinion, John, the world is about more than marketing, and companies have >an obligation to customers who are at the cutting edge, as this group is, >especially those who seek to self-honestly test and improve the program, as this >group has. Lol, are you saying that Auto232 is cutting edge technology? :)) That really made me laugh. :) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.