Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:15:52 07/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2002 at 08:31:41, Les Fernandez wrote: >On July 08, 2002 at 14:42:35, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On July 07, 2002 at 17:01:28, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>On July 07, 2002 at 15:39:04, Steve Maughan wrote: >>> >>>>Mike, >>>> >>>>Is WAC 230 correct? If I remember corretly there was a discussion here a few >>>>months back that said that Rb4 was not such a forced win e.g. >>>> >>>>http://www.it.ro/ccc_search/ccc.php?art_id=163138 >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>> >>>>Steve >>>> >>>> >>> >>>after going through it relatively quick, I have to agree with the "draw" - ther >>>e is a horizon effect that is just too deep ...Rb4 it the "best" move - until >>>the horizon comes into focus...and then it was just like all the other drawing >>>moves... >> >>I think it is still the best move because it is the only move with winning >>chances. Any other move draws at best. > >I remember we spent alot of time on this particular position trying to find the >solution. Can we now put this position to bed??? I do not think so. A position can be put to rest after a formal solution like that provided by Chest (which will also provide the refutation list, etc.). Until we have an absolute closed box there are always questions opened.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.