Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 17:36:01 07/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2002 at 17:35:35, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 09, 2002 at 17:04:03, Steve Maughan wrote: > >>Russell, >> >>>Is it simply a fast engine that is good at tactics? I can't think of what else >>>it would be. >> >>What you say is the percieved wisdom although there are exceptions such as >>Hiarcs which is good at tactics but not fast. Hopefully Shredder's Blitz win >>will start to erode the myth that it's not good at tactics. >> >>Regards, >> >>Steve > >I suspect that the operator is very important in the blitz tournament. > >Uri I'm not interested in a blitz game in which operators are involved. That doesn't tell me anything about the strength of the engine at blitz. I am more interested in the inner workings of the engine that make it good at blitz, played on ICC or on a PC between two engines, where the results do not depend on the speed and accuracy of the human hand. Russell
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.