Author: Francisco J. Pájaro Rives
Date: 04:24:31 07/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2002 at 16:51:25, Vine Smith wrote: >On July 09, 2002 at 11:48:32, Francisco J. Pájaro Rives wrote: > >>I mean which of all that powerfull engines is the one that play like a human? >>Thanks. > >This almost qualifies as a Zen koan (such as "What is the sound of one hand >clapping?). Or you might as well ask, "Which automobile is most human?". >Various claims have been made for various programs, but I do not see how any of >them can be valid, since no current programs attempt to mimic human thought >processes, especially pattern-matching and goal-directed behavior. How can any >program guided by centipawn evaluations claim to be "human"? This is not meant >to disparage the programs, which have advanced to such a point as to call into >question whether human thought processes are necessarily best, at least for >purposes of playing chess. > >Regards, >Vine Smith Yeah, I supose it´s an stupid question. ;-) I´m bored and I don´t know what to think. |o|
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.