Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The future of computer chess...

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 21:08:48 08/05/98

Go up one level in this thread


>>The same counts for the 2 tournament games. Before the 2 games my
>>main fear was that Rebel would have been slaughtered, first positional
>>out-played, then slowly strangled, all in the well known Seirawan style at
>>Aegon but then even more effective :)

>>The opposite happened. Rebel in both tournament games took the initiative
>>(a complete new experience for me!) had good winning chances in the
>>first game and some even say also in the second game, which I tend
>>to disagree on.

>The real turning point in game 8 was Rebel's choice of h2-h4 instead
>of Ke2 (this somewhere around move 24 or 25). Quite a battle would have ensued
>most likely ending in a draw. Have you looked into what may have happened
>in the event Rebel played Ke2? Will Rebel 10 be further tweaked as a result
>of these 40/2 against Anand so it could play a move like Ke2?

This is unlikely to happen in Rebel10. I checked the 2 moves Ke2 vs h4? There
is a huge score difference between them caused by the over-estimation of
the white connected passed pawns. Impossible to fix that on short terms as it
is a major and fundamental change.

- Ed -


>>What on earth is happening?
>>I know, I know, just 2 games!

>>In this respect I am really looking forward to the 6 Ferret games! It will
>>tell  us more about the current state of computer chess. Please Fernando
>>make sure this new match will take place!

>>One of my worries and also coming to my point, say Ferret will do well,
>>say a  victory of 4-2. Next a 6 game match on 40/2:00 versus comp_X
>>and Kasparov or Anand ending in 3-3 or 4-2 in favor of comp_X.

>>All speculation of course. But if it happens my worry is that it is a killer
>>for computer chess! My assumption is that people will lose interest as
>>the race on playing strength is finally decided.

>I think chess players will still purchase the programs of the future.
>A private super GM looking over your shoulder as you play through games
>sounds appealing. When do folks think the micros will hold their own
>when playing super GMs? Has anyone made a prediction like this in the past
>about micros?

>>My prediction, if it happens some of us have to look for a new job :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.