Author: stuart taylor
Date: 06:55:33 07/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2002 at 08:40:12, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >It should happend a play-off game now ... > >Results > >No Name Total Result Name Total > > 1 Shredder, [6.5] 1:0 Chinito, [4.5] > 2 Junior, [6.5] 1:0 Sjeng, [4] > 3 Diep, [5] 0:1 Brutus, [6] > 4 ParSOS, [4.5] 0:1 Quest, [5] > 5 IsiChess X, [4] =:= Goliath, [4] > 6 XiniX, [4] 0:1 Warp, [4] > 7 Postmodernist, [2.5] =:= Insomniac, [3.5] > 8 NoonianChess, [2] 0:1 Ikarus, [3.5] > 9 SpiderChess, [2.5] 1:0 Sharky, [0] > >Standings > >Place Name Feder Rtg Loc Score M-Buch. Berg. GP > > 1-2 Junior, 99 7.5 36.5 38.25 100.00 > Shredder, 100 7.5 36.0 38.50 50.00 > 3 Brutus, 95 7 36.5 33.75 40.00 > 4 Quest, 98 6 37.5 28.25 37.33 > 5-6 Diep, 96 5 39.0 20.50 34.67 > Warp, 92 5 34.5 21.00 32.00 >7-11 IsiChess X, 91 4.5 36.0 18.00 29.33 > ParSOS, 94 4.5 33.5 12.75 26.67 > Ikarus, 90 4.5 32.5 17.75 24.00 > Chinito, 86 4.5 28.5 11.50 21.33 > Goliath, 97 4.5 27.5 11.75 18.67 >12-14 Sjeng, 88 4 36.0 15.25 16.00 > XiniX, 85 4 29.0 11.25 13.33 > Insomniac, 93 4 26.0 9.50 10.67 > 15 SpiderChess, 83 3.5 26.0 9.00 8.00 > 16 Postmodernist, 89 3 26.5 6.75 5.33 > 17 NoonianChess, 84 2 28.5 3.25 2.67 > 18 Sharky, 87 0 28.0 0.00 Could it still be that Brutus is far stronger than the winners, and that this tournament was very "unlucky" for Brutus? What I mean to say is, that if brutus is only "ONE of the top" it's not enough for me to pay alot for it. I don't think anyone gave us details about Brutus recently, e.g. as to how much speed it is relatively speaking etc. I might also ask later, if not here, that IF the Brutus idea is very great, then why wouldn't it be used by Fritz, perhaps? And if so, would it trounce all else? (e.g. an increase of 100 elo?) S.Taylor S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.