Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Be or not to Be (was:how chess programmers there really is?

Author: Fernando Villegas

Date: 04:29:37 08/06/98

Go up one level in this thread


On August 05, 1998 at 18:51:16, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On August 05, 1998 at 17:28:04, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>
>>a) Chris W. is considered a professional chess programmer, but he is more the
>>owner of a company dedicated to many games and many other non-games software and
>>in fact he does not even dedicate all time to work in chess engines, as the
>>slowness of CSTAL to be delivered show, although there were also the effects of
>>developping an entirely new engine, or he tried to do so at least. But then,
>>seeing how a fraction of his entire time as programmer is dedicated to chess as
>>such, he is then not a professional chess programmer?  I think he is although he
>>does not dedicate fully to it.
>
>No - I am his slave and I am doing full-time for him :-)))
>
>>b) Or take Christophe Theron: he does not use all his time to develop Tiger
>>neither has a developed distribution system, etc, but it would be difficult to
>>describe him as just an amateur.
>
>?!?!?!?
>
>Why isn't he an amateur ?!
>
>

Why? For the reasons I gave in my post. As you say, his program is very strong
and that qualify him as a professional. at least that is my kind of definition
of what a pro is.
fernando

he is.
>
>And his program grows stronger and stronger. Maybe next championship, he wins.
>We will see...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.