Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Frank Poole v HAL 9000 -- or is it CM9000?

Author: John Merlino

Date: 14:35:40 07/11/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 11, 2002 at 16:39:08, Vine Smith wrote:

>Did you have any other clues for reconstructing the game besides knowing the
>position at move 14? The sequence leading to this point is less than obvious,
>especially the sacrifice offered at move 12, implying that either this game was
>copied from some other source, or a fairly strong player assisted in its
>creation.

I'm pretty sure that either GM Larry Evans or GM Yasser Seirawan annotated this
game. I have no idea if the game was recreated by the annotator or not, however.

>By the way, HAL never announced mate in two. It was simply engaging in
>conversation during a casual game, and merely pointed out that Poole had
>overlooked the tactical sequence allowing the queen to go to f3.
>Did Poole really "resign" AFTER being mated, as the notes imply? Stupid human.
>Maybe this is what drove HAL to start killing the crew.
>
>Regards,
>Vine Smith

I guess I'll have to watch the movie again. From what *I* remember, the final
few moves were not actually played out and Poole DID resign after HAL claimed
mate. That annotation probably SHOULD be included in Black's 15th move, but I
think we just added the final moves for amusement's sake.... :-)

jm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.