Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Frank Poole v HAL 9000 -- or is it CM9000?

Author: Vine Smith

Date: 15:59:41 07/11/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 11, 2002 at 17:35:40, John Merlino wrote:

>On July 11, 2002 at 16:39:08, Vine Smith wrote:
>
>>Did you have any other clues for reconstructing the game besides knowing the
>>position at move 14? The sequence leading to this point is less than obvious,
>>especially the sacrifice offered at move 12, implying that either this game was
>>copied from some other source, or a fairly strong player assisted in its
>>creation.
>
>I'm pretty sure that either GM Larry Evans or GM Yasser Seirawan annotated this
>game. I have no idea if the game was recreated by the annotator or not, however.

Looks like the game was copied, as I found this in the Chessbase online
database:

[Event "Hamburg Hauptturnier-B"]
[Site "Hamburg"]
[Date "1910.??.??"]
[Round "0"]
[White "Roesch"]
[Black "Schlage,Willi"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Eco "C86"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.Qe2 b5 6.Bb3 Be7 7.c3 0-0 8.0-0 d5
9.exd5 Nxd5 10.Nxe5 Nf4 11.Qe4 Nxe5 12.Qxa8 Qd3 13.Bd1 Bh3 14.Qxa6 Bxg2 15.Re1
Qf3 0-1

While it's amusing to keep the Poole - HAL game in CM's database, perhaps the
original source should also be included, or at least cited. And quite an obscure
source it is -- one wonders where Kubrick et al. could have dug this up in the
pre-PC era. Perhaps it was in the Chernev collection "1000 Shortest Games of
Chess" (or something like that), which had wide circulation at the time.

>
>>By the way, HAL never announced mate in two. It was simply engaging in
>>conversation during a casual game, and merely pointed out that Poole had
>>overlooked the tactical sequence allowing the queen to go to f3.
>>Did Poole really "resign" AFTER being mated, as the notes imply? Stupid human.
>>Maybe this is what drove HAL to start killing the crew.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Vine Smith
>
>I guess I'll have to watch the movie again. From what *I* remember, the final
>few moves were not actually played out and Poole DID resign after HAL claimed
>mate. That annotation probably SHOULD be included in Black's 15th move, but I
>think we just added the final moves for amusement's sake.... :-)
>
>jm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.