Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:18:03 07/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2002 at 12:45:19, Tony Werten wrote: >On July 12, 2002 at 12:27:39, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>I evaluated the opponents that Shredder and Junior 7 faced and it seems as >>Brutus had the best performance based on the level of opponents that is faced. >> > >Really ? Can you explain how you came to that conclusion ? First it is a _false_ assumption. The lower you are rated, the "higher" your "resistance" factor. Because if you are number 1, you can not _play_ number one to get the benefit of his total score. It is pretty common to see crosstables where players below 1 have a higher "sum of opponents" score. For the reason mentioned... > >If I look at the opponents, I see Brutus having 36.5 resistance points, the same >as Junior. I also see Quest having 37.5 and Diep even having 39. > >Actually, if I look at the top 5 I only see 1 program having less resistance >points ( Shredder with 36 ) than Brutus. > >Tony > >>Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.