Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 06:46:16 07/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2002 at 14:29:17, Louis Fagliano wrote: >He seems to have replaced John van der Wiel as the leading computer killer (at >least on this board). Rebel managed to overcome van der Wiel's anti-computer >chess style and beat him in a challenge match. Since Ed Schroeder has retired >from playing challenge matches against humans, is there anyone with a copy of >Rebel Century 4.0 and a fast computer (sorry, mine's only 500 MHz) and would >want to challenge Mr. Nemeth to a match? > >But more importantly, are programmers looking at his games and trying to figure >out how to combat his particular anti-computer chess? Or is his anti-computer >chess nothing special and can be used by most top GM's? If he can't be beaten >by comps then there is no point in even bothering to hold the Kramnik vs. Fritz >match. > >Obviously if the holy grail of computer chess is to someday produce programs >that can surpass human world champions then first of all anti-anti-computer >chess has to be perfected. We know nothing about HOW he plays. He might have the computer's output being shown, he might have other proceses running. He may be running on a ancient computer. ANd to top it off he uses the trojan horse attack, which guess what, I can beat the comptuers using that too on slow hardware with faster time controls.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.