Author: Omid David
Date: 08:17:12 07/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2002 at 10:50:52, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 13, 2002 at 02:07:17, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>I still do not understand which positions you talk about which R=2 >>is finding and R=3 isn't. > >Note that he used fixed-depth. This is therefore not surprising since >some lines will be searched one ply shallower.. Of course. I merely did something like Heinz in "adaptive null-move pruning" (he searched to fixed depths of 8, 10 and 12). But to get a clearer distinction, I turned off checks in qsearch (that means in practice R=3 would perform better than it did in those tests)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.