Author: John Merlino
Date: 13:48:22 07/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2002 at 19:15:10, Coxwell Strange wrote: >Yes, it is known that different programs report the search depths differently, >and chessmaster more conservatively than most, in fact the only one that i know >of more so is genius, where its 8 ply plays like cm 110 in an equivalent time. >CM 10 ply plays about like other programs 12 ply, but still takes much longer >than their 12 ply. Cm is not a professional class program like fritz and some >others ( but i wish it was ! ) You still fail to see the flaw in your argument, >and that primarily is, that if it were as good as u say, believe me, the public >would be useing it on the net, they are not, and you cannot understand why i >suppose :( .. (but durn... wish i could get u to understand what is it like >trying to battle those stronger programs with chessmaster, and failing that, it >is unlikely that we shall see a chessmaster version that can, have tried all the >newer versions with less success than cm55). "Not a professional class program"? You seem to have not noticed the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.... jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.