Author: John Merlino
Date: 13:51:42 07/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2002 at 16:02:20, Marc van Hal wrote: >On July 13, 2002 at 14:43:58, John Merlino wrote: > >>On July 13, 2002 at 13:10:57, Marc van Hal wrote: >> >>>Would this be because the think it is the most human style? >>>Or because they think it's the strongest program in blitz? >>>Or because they find it the most easiest interface. >>>Or because it is the most sold product >>>I think the last but their could be other reasons. >>> >>>Regards Marc van Hal >> >>I would say it is most likely the last reason, simply because there are so many >>more copies of Chessmaster out there than any other program. >> >>BTW, How do you KNOW that Chessmaster is most used for cheating? >> >>jm > > >I checked my analyses with and against many programs > also against many diferent styles of Chessmaster >The Botvinik personelty for instance is very popular on the gaming zone > >Though all Chessmaster personeltys have something typical the King alogorithems. >When i play games myself and the first 20 moves though long out of theory are >exactly the same you have a very good bet with who you are dealing with. >espacialy if you controle the time used for each move and when the oponent >started to take time to find a way to contineu it's further plans. >I rarely found cheaters which used typical Friz Junior or Rebel or Tiger moves >Ok there still is an open field of amateur programs >But Still the kings style is diferent >I created one Chessmaster personellty which behaved the same as the other >programs though >Which had to do something with the Material\Position settings. >Then again there are still many cyborgs. >Then it is harder to detect >which program is being used. >But i must say that I can memorize many of my analyses better because of this. >If I trapped someone in remembering a precise position I alwas ask him if he >does learn something from it. >If this is so Then he rather would be honest and say why he wants to use the >program. >I think that learning could be a good reason. >aking the credit of someonelses work is something I will not give. >And emailing Johan for every game Chessmaster won is to much work hehe. > >Regards Marc Noted. :-) jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.