Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 01:50:21 07/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2002 at 03:24:17, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >from Shredder - IsiChess, 10.WCCC Maastricht Round1 > >[D] 8/k1p1r3/p2b3p/5ppq/1np5/6P1/1R1N1P1P/R4QK1 b - - am c3 > >here IsiChess blundered with 43...c3?? (instead of Qe2 or Re2) Analysis by Sjeng 12.14 Maastricht: 1...Nd3 2.Rb5 +- (2.09) Depth: 2 00:00:00 1...c3 ± (1.16) Depth: 2/6 00:00:00 1...c3 2.g4 cxb2 3.gxh5 bxa1Q 4.Qxa1 = (-0.25) Depth: 2/6 00:00:00 1...c3 = (0.25) Depth: 3/10 00:00:00 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Bxb4 3.Qxa6+ Kb8 4.Qb5+ Kc8 5.Qxf5+ ± (1.03) Depth: 3/10 00:00:00 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Bxb4 3.Qxa6+ Kb8 4.Qb5+ Kc8 5.Qxf5+ ± (1.03) Depth: 3/10 00:00:00 1...c3 +- (1.53) Depth: 4/18 00:00:00 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Nd3 ± (1.07) Depth: 4/18 00:00:00 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Nd3 ± (1.07) Depth: 4/18 00:00:00 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Nd3 4.Rba2 Nc5 ± (1.19) Depth: 5/18 00:00:00 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Nd3 4.Rba2 Nc5 ± (1.19) Depth: 5/18 00:00:00 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Re4 4.Nd2 Be5 5.Rab1 Bxb2 6.Nxe4 ± (1.24) Depth: 6/18 00:00:00 147kN 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Re4 4.Nd2 Be5 5.Rab1 Bxb2 6.Nxe4 ± (1.24) Depth: 6/21 00:00:01 325kN 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Re4 4.Nxd6 cxd6 5.f3 Rd4 6.Rab1 +- (1.45) Depth: 7/21 00:00:01 425kN 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Re4 4.Nxd6 cxd6 5.f3 Rd4 6.Rab1 +- (1.45) Depth: 7/24 00:00:02 1119kN 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Re4 4.Rc1 g4 5.Rd2 Be7 6.Rd7 +- (1.44) Depth: 8/24 00:00:02 1416kN 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Re4 4.Rc1 g4 5.Rd2 Be7 6.Rd7 +- (1.44) Depth: 8/25 00:00:04 2466kN 1...Qe2 2.Nxc4 Qxf1+ 3.Kxf1 Re4 4.Nxd6 cxd6 5.f3 Rd4 6.Rab1 a5 7.Kf2 +- (1.51) Depth: 9/25 00:00:05 3002kN 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Qe2 3.Rd4 cxd2 4.Rxd2 Qxf1+ 5.Kxf1 Be5 6.Re1 Bf6 7.Rxe7 Bxe7 8.Ke2 ± (1.26) Depth: 9/27 00:00:10 7192kN 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Qe2 3.Rd4 cxd2 4.Rxd2 Qxf1+ 5.Kxf1 Be5 6.Re1 Bf6 7.Rxe7 Bxe7 8.Ke2 ± (1.26) Depth: 9/30 00:00:11 7787kN 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Qe2 3.Rd4 cxd2 4.Rxd2 Qxf1+ 5.Kxf1 Be5 6.Rad1 g4 7.f3 gxf3 8.Kf2 ± (1.30) Depth: 10/30 00:00:21 14950kN 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Qe2 3.Rd4 cxd2 4.Rxd2 Qxf1+ 5.Kxf1 Be5 6.Rad1 g4 7.f3 gxf3 8.Kf2 ± (1.30) Depth: 10/34 00:00:30 20704kN 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Qe2 3.Rd4 cxd2 4.Rxd2 Qxf1+ 5.Kxf1 Bb4 6.Rd5 f4 7.Rad1 c6 8.Rd8 Kb6 9.gxf4 gxf4 ± (1.24) Depth: 11/34 00:00:57 39000kN 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Qe2 3.Rd4 cxd2 4.Rxd2 Qxf1+ 5.Kxf1 Bb4 6.Rd5 f4 7.Rad1 c6 8.Rd8 Kb6 9.gxf4 gxf4 ± (1.24) Depth: 11/39 00:01:32 61265kN 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Qe2 3.Rd4 cxd2 4.Rxd2 Qxf1+ 5.Kxf1 Re6 6.Kg2 Re1 7.Rxe1 ± (1.40) Depth: 12/39 00:03:32 142944kN 1...c3 2.Rxb4 Qe2 3.Rd4 cxd2 4.Rxd2 Qxf1+ 5.Kxf1 Re6 6.Kg2 Re1 7.Rxe1 ± (1.40) Depth: 12/42 00:07:21 291391kN (Pascutto, Gent 14.07.2002) >I might have a closer look to positions like this, for some huge king penalties: > >[D] 8/8/3pr2p/RQ4p1/2k5/6P1/3pqP1P/6K1 b - - This is at least +5 in my engine, but it seems that isn't enough. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.